Tag Archives: television

Fall TV: Return to Westeros, Middle Earth, and More

Fall television season is upon us, and fantasy fans are eating well. I have a real penchant for fantasy movies and television shows based on books that I haven’t read, and there is plenty of new content to keep us entertained as the nights start to get darker. Below are some adaptations I’m particularly excited about; let us know your own picks in the comments! 

House of the Dragon

How are we feeling, everyone? Are we ready to revisit the world of Westeros? Have we put our hurt sufficiently behind us? We all remember the catastrophe that was season 8. I don’t want to talk about it. Suffice to say, when Game of Thrones ended in 2019, I declared that I would never lay eyes on another A Song of Ice and Fireadjacent property again. Fool me once, right? Cut to three years later, which in pandemic years feels more like eight, and I find myself cautiously optimistic about this new prequel series. The groundwork has already been laid; we already know the houses and the lore of Westeros. We all have our fave houses (Tyrell forever!). But where Game of Thrones spanned several houses and the entire continent of Westeros (and a bit of Essos), House of the Dragon, based on the novel Fire and Blood, reins in the scope to focus mainly on the platinum-haired, dragon-wielding Targaryen family.  

Where the original series covered conflicts and power grabs from house to house, House of the Dragon deals with the inter-family civil war known as the Dance of the Dragons (not to be confused with A Dance with Dragons, the fifth book in the Song of Ice and Fire series…), which is essentially a war of succession (funnily, apparently the showrunners looked to Succession for inspiration). So get ready for more inappropriate family relationships (the Targaryens are famously incestuous, much like the real-life Ptolemy and Habsburg dynasties) and confusing names like Rhaenyra, Rhaenys, Aemond, Daemon, and multiple other combinations of a and e (as someone who still can’t spell Daenerys without the help of Google, this will surely be fun for me). I just watched Wigs Versailles, a show about King Louis XIV’s court at the titular palace, full of melodrama, political machinations, assassinations and the like (and also beautiful, gorgeous hair). So I, for one, am primed and ready for more of that…plus dragons.  

House of the Dragon airs on Crave (HBO), Sunday nights at 9:00 pm. Get caught up on the original series here.

Continue reading

Conversations (or Not) With Friends

On May 15, Prime Video released Conversations with Friends, the latest Hulu/BBC television adaptation of Irish author Sally Rooney’s work. Based on the novel of the same name, Conversations with Friends is saddled sophomore syndrome (despite having been published first); when Normal People was released shortly after the first lockdown in 2020, it found an immediate audience in those of us (read: everyone) trapped inside with little else to do but stream series after series (after series). It was a fortuitous combination of right place and right time. Following the lives of students Marianne and Connell in Sligo and Dublin, the show’s low-key, meditative ambience made for gentle watching, while the depiction of ordinary city life allowed viewers to channel our yearning for what, only a month prior, we had taken for granted as normal—with no return date in sight. Conversations with Friends, therefore, has the unenviable role of following a surprise hit. So, does it fill those big shoes? Unfortunately (perhaps predictably), no.  

I will confess, when BBC first announced their plan to adapt Normal People for the small screen, I was skeptical. I’m not someone who believes that the book is always better (some things just work better on the screen), but I just couldn’t envision Rooney’s sparse, methodical prose translated in any sort of visually compelling way. I will happily admit to being proven wrong—dramatically so! What the show does with Rooney’s work truly deserves the old cliché “bringing the novel to life”. Though all of Rooney’s characters are flawed and well-rounded, there is a deliberate lack of emotionality in her writing that the show makes up for. Take, for example, the scene where Connell goes to therapy. In the book, the narration transcribes the situation from an impassive distance, and we only find out Connell is crying at the end of the passage. Now contrast that with the show’s interpretation, where we watch intimately as Connell breaks down in real time.  

But where Normal People gains something from its adaptation, Conversations with Friends loses something. The novel is a highly interior account of a friendship and an affair from main character Frances’s (another Dublin student) perspective. It’s not so much about what happens as it is about how she digests and responds to things internally. The show adopts the sombre, pensive atmosphere of Normal People, but it doesn’t really work here. Frances is not an outwardly emotive person, and neither is Nick, her love interest (he is astutely called “pathologically passive” by his much more interesting wife). What we end up with is silence. And silence. And more silence. It takes until the halfway point for Nick to do more than just grunt “yeah” in a hoarse whisper. At one point, Frances’s best friend and ex-girlfriend Bobbi says to her, “You know how your whole silent thing makes everyone think you’re enigmatic and interesting?” It’s just…not true. It’s frustrating! And it makes her seem bland.  

Continue reading

Bridgerton: The Allure of the Regency

On April 12, join us for Lady Whistledown Presents: A Bridgerton Soirée for an evening of decadence and discussion as we take on the Ton of London’s high society! For ages 18+.

When Brigderton first premiered on Christmas Day of 2020, it wasn’t long before streaming numbers exploded and the historical romance was crowned the most-streamed show in Netflix history. Despite the period setting, it always had the makings of a hit: a Shondaland production, a Jane Austen-meets-Gossip Girl (with an R rating) plot, gorgeous costumes, and an even more gorgeous cast. Throw in the fact that we were all still locked in our homes and needing some form of breezy distraction, and voila! The show has since been bumped from the top spot by Squid Game, but let’s see where season two lands. If you’re like me, you’ve probably devoured season two of Bridgerton by now—perhaps more than once. 

Season two of the show is based on The Viscount Who Loved Me, book two in the Bridgerton book series by Julia Quinn. I confess that I myself have never read the books, so I can’t speak to the show’s faithfulness—but what I can speak to is the pivot to a more traditional Regency style: season two trades the graphic love scenes for simmering tension, barbed snipes, and charged glances. And honestly, the show is all the better for it. Our mains this season are Viscount Anthony Bridgerton, eldest of the siblings, and Miss Kate Sharma, who comes to England from India in order to find a match for her younger sister. It’s the enemies-to-lovers story we’ve been waiting for! Anyone who was despairing over the lack of season one’s Duke, do not fear: these two more than make up for the loss. 

I’ve long been a fan of period dramas, and I’ve seen just about every Jane Austen adaption to date (you better believe I’m already hyped for the upcoming Persuasion movie starring Dakota Johnson). And I’m certainly not alone! Regency is the most popular subgenre of romance fiction; next time you’re at the library, just take note of how many paperbacks feature dukes and women in period-inappropriate dresses. It’s a lot! But what makes this extremely niche time period so alluring, 200 years later? The Regency period was, quite literally, only nine years in English history (1811-1820). Nine! So what gives? 

Continue reading